Margaret Douglas, Countess of Lennox

Known for: known for her plotting on behalf of Roman Catholicism in England.  Ã‚  She was the  grandmother of James VI of Scotland who became James I of England, and the mother of James father, Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley.. Margaret Douglas was the niece of Tudor King Henry VIII and granddaughter of Henry VII. Dates: October 8, 1515 - March 7, 1578 Heritage Margaret Douglas  mother was Margaret Tudor, daughter of Englands King Henry VII and Elizabeth of York. Margaret Tudor, named for her paternal grandmother,  Margaret Beaufort, was the widow of James IV of Scotland. Margaret Douglas father was Archibald Douglas, 6th Earl of Angus; the marriage of Margaret Tudor and Archibald Douglas in 1514, at first secret, was the second for each, and alienated many of the other Scottish nobles and threatened her supervision of her two sons by James IV, James V (1512-1542) and Alexander (1514-1515). Margaret Douglas, the only child of her mothers second marriage, was brought up with and was a lifelong friend to King Henry VIIIs daughter by Catherine of Aragon, Princess Mary, later Englands Queen Mary I. Scandalous Relations Margaret Douglas became engaged to Thomas Howard while she was a lady-in-waiting to Anne Boleyn, the second queen of Margarets uncle Henry VIII. Howard was sent to the Tower of London in 1537 for their unauthorized relationship, as Margaret was at that time next in line of succession, Henry VIII having declared illegitimate his daughters Mary and Elizabeth. Love poems she wrote to Thomas Howard were preserved in the Devonshire MS, now in the British Library. Margaret had reconciled with her uncle by 1539, when he asked her to greet his new bride Anne of Cleves on her arrival in England. In 1540, Margaret had an affair with Charles Howard, nephew of Thomas Howard and brother of Catherine Howard, the fifth queen of Henry VIII. But again Henry VIII reconciled with his niece, and Margaret was a witness to his sixth and final marriage, to Catherine Parr, who had known Margaret for many years. Marriage In 1544, Margaret Douglas married Matthew Stewart, the 4th Earl of Lennox, who was living in England. Their elder son, Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley, in 1565 married Mary, Queen of Scots, daughter of James V, Margaret Douglas half-brother. The Stewart (Stuart) name for a later line of kings of England and Scotland comes from Margaret Douglas second husband through the son of Mary, Queen of Scots, and Lord Darnley. Plotting Against Elizabeth After Marys death and the succession of Protestant Queen Elizabeth I in 1558, Margaret Douglas retired to Yorkshire, where she became involved with Roman Catholic plotting. In 1566 Elizabeth had Lady Lennox sent to the Tower. Margaret Douglas was released after her son, Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley, was murdered in 1567. In 1570-71, Matthew Stewart, Margarets husband, became Regent in Scotland; he was assassinated in 1571. Margaret was again imprisoned in 1574 when her younger son Charles married without royal permission; she was pardoned in 1577 after he died. She briefly helped care for the daughter of Charles, Arbella Stuart. Death and Legacy Margaret Douglas died only a year after she was released. Queen Elizabeth I gave her a large funeral. Her effigy lies in Westminster Abbey, where her son Charles is also buried. The grandson of Margaret Douglas, James, who was the son of Henry Stewart, Lord Darnley, and of Mary, Queen of Scots, became King James VI of Scotland and, at the death of Elizabeth I, was crowned King James I of England. He was the first Stewart king.

Racism And Sexism For A Brighter Future - 949 Words

The description of issue due to racism and sexism is given below supported by educators articles which includes Dr. James Waller and Sikivu Hutchinson. Throughout this essay, the mission is to prevent discrimination and stereotypes for a brighter future. As we list the common issues that are occurring in america’s society that initially came from human nature of the elder generations. As we believe in a way of life that dictates what one can do and can not do because of race, gender, ethnicity, and interest. We consider these by-laws as the normal in society. Stereotyping and racism Everyday someone is abused of their legal rights, and today people are affected by racism and sexism due to their ethnicity and gender. I ask have you ever been limited on what you can and cannot do? Many americans are limited to what careers, education, and others due to stereotyping. Stereotyping is a way that one describes what you are interested in and future careers due to just the visual of yourself and your beliefs. As I have experienced what it is like to be stereotyped, I know many other have experienced the same. Will there ever be a solution to the society error that we describe as normal? Or would you like it if someone treated you the way you treat others? Society will change over time due to the human race and their actions. Someday we will live equal lives and that is the day we will conquer world peace, but today what will we do as individuals or together to improve theShow MoreRelatedAccording To Bethel University (2011), Leadership Is An800 W ords   |  4 Pagescontrolled virtually all aspects of life. Indeed, over 90% of university administrators, 99% of business leaders, and 100% of senators were white males. Furthermore, the lack of representation from minority groups and women resulted in intense racism and sexism. The mid-20th century civil rights movement was in need of a great leader to shift the paradigm of abuse and denial of freedom. Edwards (2010) outlines Dr. King’s courage to take center stage in a country divided by racial injustice and controlledRead MorePopulation Health Planning Is Based On The Social Model Of Health1239 Words   |  5 Pagesapproaches look at socioeconomic status, yet still overlook the underlying forces that influence socioeconomic status (Coburn et al., 2003). The concept of analysing underlying societal factors became prominent when US researchers looked into how racism (Krieger et al., 1993; Krieger, 2000), class relations (Mutaner and Lynch, 1999) and the market economy (Navarro, 1999) can change US population health. Nevertheless, population health approaches have showed success utilising evidence-based decisionRead MoreAmerican Values : Family And Education1788 Words   |  8 Pagesaffordable child care they may not support it. Some feel that if the parents followed the moral values of American in terms of supporting yourself, getting married prior to children then the individual requesting services would not need services. Sexism and Racism are also two other major factors. Instead of focusing on the positivity and the facts at hand some may be focused on the stigmas of marital status and minorities. In order to get this bill passed we must appeal to wide range of politicians andRead MoreThe Color Purple By Alice Walker1873 Words   |  8 PagesThe Color Purple is an passionate novel based on the letters wrote by a hopeless black woman who goes by Miss Celie. In Celie’s letters, she illuminates the negative boundaries in role of tradition gender, sexism, racism and sexual relationship . Those negative boundaries have set up the unfairness treatment for black women in early twenty century. Back then, base on norms, men should play in masculine roles, which usually related to strength, controlling, and dominance, while women should play inRead MoreThe Color Purple, by Alice Walker Essay1969 Words   |  8 PagesAfrica are a direct correlation to Celie’s life in America and emphasizes key themes in the novel, such as sexism, racism and power struggle, and the importance of women working together to overcome their barriers. Despite Alice Walker receiving a substantial amount of criticism about her novel and her portrayal of African Americans, through all the negativity she hints to a better future for generations to come through the development of characters throughout the story. In The Color Purple, AliceRead MoreThe Reality Of Athletics : The World Would Never Be The Same Without Sports2110 Words   |  9 Pages be it the Super Bowl or the Champions League final. There is always a team to cheer for, and these games bring people together, and sometimes split them apart. Sports are about more than just who wins or loses and they can effect schools and the future of the students who play them. In the past sports have created uprisings, started and even ended wars, many having to do with races and equality. Forming cultures, and even in the business world, sports can change everything. Some say sports are onlyRead MoreArticle Review : The Orlando Shooting 1907 Words   |  8 Pagesothers. It is a risk for the country to have an easy firearm, whether for safety or not, it is lethal. Relevance: The Orlando shooting is one of the most tragic events that happened in the U.S., which causes people to wonder what will happen in the future, such as, â€Å"Will there be more deaths arriving at an untimely manner?† The opinions about banning/tightening gun protection are unscrupulous to others whereas the other majority trusts that it will benefit the United States later on, including myselfRead MoreReligion : Uncovering A Great Fallacy1774 Words   |  8 Pagesour minds for good and nurture the curiosity within all children, to never be content with mediocrity and lies, to not succumb to trickery and feel responsible for the sins of others. Only through this avenue can we begin to see a brighter future free of racism and sexism, a well-functioning and cooperative civilization. Read MoreCaring for Children and Young People Unit 10 Level 3 Ext7629 Words   |  31 Pagesis happening to their family and can result in the child/children feeling angry because the parents have not listened to how the child/children feel about the situation and are not able to have any any decisions in the matter that will affect their future. Due to the stress and lack of communication children/young people from broken families can end up in the care system because â€Å"Children from broken homes three times more likely to run away†. Bereavement- â€Å"Bereavement is the experience of those leftRead MoreSadie Hawkins Day and Valentine Grams18321 Words   |  74 Pagesa sense of love he had for the game of tennis, a passion that he seems to have every second when he is on the court. This passion left everyone in that press room motivated to achieve their own goals in life and that was when my day began to look brighter. â€Å"It disturbs me every time I walk by the area. I personally feel that the students deserve the tickets for parking in the wrong spots,† explains Biology teacher Jason Dries in his unrelenting complaints about students parking in marked disabled

The Cons of Marijuana Usage Free Essays

The legalization of marijuana is one of the most highly debated about subjects facing Americans today. Advocates of legalization use two major arguments in their effort to have marijuana legalized. First, which is by far the biggest argument is that marijuana has a significant medical use. We will write a custom essay sample on The Cons of Marijuana Usage or any similar topic only for you Order Now The second argument is that marijuana does not cause harm to those that smoke it. Both of these arguments can be easily discounted by the numerous studies that have been done on the effects of marijuana both medicinal and recreational. In the following paragraphs we will explore the hard facts of marijuana that will discount the validity of the previously mentioned arguments as well as some common fallacies. I will focus first on the medical fallacy. There currently exists a great debate concerning smoking marijuana as a medicine. Many well-intentioned leaders and members of the public have been led misled by the well-financed and organized pro-drug legalization lobby into believing there is merit to their argument that smoking marijuana is a safe and effective medicine. A review of the scientific research, expert medical testimony, and government agency findings shows this to be erroneous. There is no justification for using marijuana as a medicine. The movement to legitimize smoking marijuana as a medicine is not encouraged by the Federal Food and Drug Administration, health and medical associations, or medical experts; but instead by groups such as the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML) and the Drug Policy Foundation (DPF). These organizations have little medical expertise and favor various forms of legalizing illicit drugs. The studies cited by the marijuana advocates have been found to be unscientific, poorly researched, and involved pharmaceutical THC, not marijuana. An advocate that claimed he was an expert, testified at the 1987 federal hearings to reschedule marijuana, was in fact a wellness counselor at a health spa who admitted under oath to using every illegal mind-altering drug he ever studied. Another â€Å"expert† admitted he had not kept up with new medical or scientific information on marijuana for over 18 years. Another doctor claimed there was voluminous medical research on the effectiveness of marijuana but under oath, when asked to cite the number of the studies, he replied, â€Å"I would doubt very few. † The fact is that there is not one reliable scientific study that shows smoking marijuana to be a safe and effective drug. The majority of the marijuana advocates’ â€Å"evidence† comes from unscientific, non-scrutinized or analyzed anecdotal statements from people with a variety of illnesses. It is unknown whether these individuals used marijuana prior to their illness or are using marijuana in combination with other medicines. It is also unknown whether they have had recent medical examinations, are justifying their use of marijuana, experiencing a placebo effect, or experiencing the intoxicating effect of smoking marijuana. The main psychoactive ingredient in marijuana (THC) is already legally available in pharmaceutical capsule form by prescription from medical doctors. This drug, Marinol, is less often prescribed because of the potential adverse effects, and there are more effective new medicines currently available. Marinol differs from the crude plant marijuana because it consists of one pure, well-studied, FDA-approved pharmaceutical in stable known dosages. Marijuana is an unstable mixture of over 400 chemicals including many toxic psychoactive chemicals, which are largely unstudied and appear in uncontrolled strengths. The manufacturers of Marinol, Roxane Laboratories Incorporated, do not agree with the pro-marijuana advocates that THC is safe and harmless. In the Physician’s Desk Reference, a good portion of the description of Marinol includes warnings about the adverse effects. Seriously, doesn t common sense dictate that it is not good medical practice to allow a substance to be used as a medicine if that product is ingested by smoking, not FDA-approved, made up of hundreds of different chemicals, and self-prescribed and administered by the patient. The federal government, over the last 20 years involving a number of administrations from both political parties, has determined that smoking marijuana has no redeeming medicinal value, and is in fact harmful to health. These governmental agencies include the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Food and Drug Administration, and the U. S. Public Health Service. Their latest finding, as recently as 1994, was affirmed in a decision by the U. S. Court of Appeals in Washington, DC Since the pro-marijuana lobby has been unsuccessful in dealing with the federal government, they have targeted state and local governments to legitimize smoking marijuana as a medicine. A careful examination of their legislative and/or ballot proposals reveals they are written to effectively neutralize the enforcement of most marijuana laws. Crude, intoxicating marijuana under their proposals would be easier to obtain and use than even the most harmless, low-level prescription drug. Major medical and health organizations, as well as the vast majority of nationally recognized expert medical doctors, scientists and researchers, have not accepted smoking marijuana as a safe and effective medicine. These organizations include: the American Medical Association, the American Cancer Society, National Sclerosis Association, the American Glaucoma Association, American Academy of Ophthalmology, National Eye Institute, National Cancer Institute, National Institute for Neurological Disorders and Stroke, National Institute of Dental Research, and the National Institute on Allergy and Infectious Diseases. There are thousands of studies available documenting the harmful physical and psychological effects of smoking marijuana. The harmful consequences include but are not limited to premature cancer, addiction, coordination and perception impairment, a number of mental disorders including depression, hostility and increased aggressiveness, general apathy, memory loss, reproductive disabilities, impairment to the immune system, numerous airway injuries, and other general problems associated with intoxication. So far I have shown why marijuana should be disregarded as medicinal now I intend to discount some more common fallacies that marijuana advocates like to throw around as well as the argument that marijuana causes no harm to the smoker. First, advocates for marijuana like to say laws against alcohol and drugs don t work so why have them. They often use prohibition in the early 1900 s as an example. Even though prohibition was unpopular and only in effect for about fourteen years, it did impact the use of alcohol. Alcohol use, alcohol-related deaths, and admissions to hospitals for other alcohol related illnesses were all reduced approximately 50 percent. Also, contrary to what you hear, there’s no evidence of a big increase in crime. That probably makes for good gangster movies, but little else. Prohibition was rescinded because alcohol historically had been part of our lives, and the majority didn t support prohibition. Drugs, on the other hand, have not been part of our everyday lives, and over 80 percent of Americans favor drug prohibition A second fallacy is that legalizing marijuana would reduce the number of crimes and would free up prison space for more violent offenders. First of all there are 12 million arrests made annually out of which 1 million are for drug violations, of these only 12 percent are sentenced to prison. Most of the criminals that are locked up already have rap sheets a mile long for different crimes anyways. Now if we legalize marijuana the arrests would stop because of the change in the criminal code but the criminals wouldn t change their behavior and become law-abiding citizens. They will continue to commit crimes to pay rent, buy cars, go to concerts, buy clothes, eat, and buy legal drugs. Thirdly, most advocates like to use the Netherlands as an example of marijuana being legalized and not having any problems. The Netherlands has begun experiencing a variety of problems including a rise in crime, welfare, unemployment, and addicts from other countries migrating there to indulge their drug appetites. A fourth common fallacy is that if we legalize marijuana we would save at least 20 billion dollars annually that is now used towards law enforcement. What this fallacy assumes is that there would be no governmental costs associated with distribution, regulation, and control of legal drugs. Using alcohol as a model, we know these costs can be substantial. Knowing government, there is very little they do that is cost effective. In 1965, when we started Medicare, Congress projected that it would cost this country $12 billion by 1990. The actual costs that year were $110 billion. In 1968 food stamps cost $173 million annually, and now, less than 30 years later, the price tag is $24 billion. And, finally the greatest fallacy that marijuana does not harm the user. The fact remains that marijuana and hashish are intoxicating substances that make the user high. The degree of mental and physical impairment depends on the amount and strength of marijuana smoked. There is a substantial difference between the 2 to 5 percent THC weed of the ’70s and the 10 to 20 percent THC in today’s weed. There is a definite reason why the higher grade is more desirable and expensive, and that’s simply because it gives the user a more powerful high. Studies show marijuana can and often does cause apathy, diminishes mental capacity, causes difficulty in concentrating, decline in performance, and lost motivation. Thousands of studies also show marijuana use adversely affects the brain, reproduction process, immune system, respiratory system, cardiovascular system, and remains in the body for extended periods of time. In addition, marijuana use often impairs normal thought processes, distorts reality, reduces self-control, and releases inhibitions, all of which increase the chance of harmful and criminal behavior. Many times the user is unaware he or she is being affected unless told by others. A Stanford Medical School study showed pilots to be impaired 24 hours after smoking one joint, even though they felt they were functioning normally. In conclusion, the bottom line is, whenever persons are under the influence, they pose a threat to themselves and others. We don’t need more intoxicated people on our streets, at public events, or driving on our highways. Traffic fatality studies clearly demonstrate a disproportionate number of deaths caused by drivers under the influence of marijuana. Why would we want to make a substance like that legal, inexpensive and readily available to satisfy he desires of a few who already choose to violate our laws? Haven’t the advocates learned anything from our experience with drunkenness? How to cite The Cons of Marijuana Usage, Essay examples